<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:publisher>Jan Sramek Verlag</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>Faber, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
  <dc:description xml:lang="deu">Das Werk arbeitet wesentliche Entwicklungslinien im Mobiliarsicherungsrecht (Pfandrecht, Sicherungseigentum, Sicherungszession, Eigentumsvorbehalt) vom Römischen Recht über die Kodifikationszeit bis ins geltende Recht insbesondere in Österreich heraus, analysiert zentrale Fragestellungen – insbesondere solche betreffend Mobiliarsicherheitenregister – zum deutschen, niederländischen, französischen, belgischen und englischen Recht und überprüft auf dieser Grundlage, ob der 2009 von einer internationalen Expertengruppe vorgelegte „Draft Common Frame of Reference“ (DCFR) sachgerechte Lösungen anbietet, die geeignet sind, diese Rechtsentwicklung konsequent fortzuführen. Die einzelnen Ergebnisse lassen sich dahin zusammenfassen, dass der DCFR fast durchgehend sachlich attraktive und zukunftsweisende Lösungen anbietet.</dc:description>
  <dc:type xml:lang="eng">Text</dc:type>
  <dc:title xml:lang="deu">Entwicklungslinien und Entwicklungsperspektiven im Mobiliarsicherungsrecht</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>ISBN: 978-3-7097-0329-8</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:https://doi.org/10.52018/INKB-00329-K000</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://e-book.fwf.ac.at/o:1895</dc:identifier>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="deu">Mobiliarsicherungsrecht; Pfandrecht; Sicherungseigentum; Sicherungsabtretung; Sicherungszession; Eigentumsvorbehalt; Sicherungsrecht; Treuhand; Rechtsentwicklung; Rechtsvergleich; Rechtsvereinheitlichung, europäische; Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR); Österreich; Deutschland; Belgien; England, Frankreich; Niederlande; Römisches Recht.</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="deu">ÖFOS 2012 -- SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN (5) -- Rechtswissenschaften (505)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="deu">ÖFOS 2012 -- SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN (5) -- Rechtswissenschaften (505) -- Rechtsvergleichung (505017)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="deu">ÖFOS 2012 -- SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN (5) -- Rechtswissenschaften (505) -- Rechtsgeschichte (505014)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="deu">ÖFOS 2012 -- SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN (5) -- Rechtswissenschaften (505) -- Römisches Recht (505019)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="deu">BIC Standard Subject Categories</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="deu">BIC Standard Subject Categories</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="deu">BIC Standard Subject Categories</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="deu">BIC Standard Subject Categories</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="deu">BIC Standard Subject Categories</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="ita">ÖFOS 2012</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="ita">ÖFOS 2012</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="ita">ÖFOS 2012</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="ita">ÖFOS 2012</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="ita">BIC Standard Subject Categories</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="ita">BIC Standard Subject Categories</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="ita">BIC Standard Subject Categories</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="ita">BIC Standard Subject Categories</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="ita">BIC Standard Subject Categories</dc:subject>
  <dc:language>deu</dc:language>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">security right in movable assets; pledge; charge; assignment for security purposes; transfer of title for security purposes; retention of title; developmnt of law; harmonisation of law in Europe; Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR); Austria, Germany, Belgium; England; France; Netherlands; Roman law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">ÖFOS 2012 -- SOCIAL SCIENCES (5) -- Law (505)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">ÖFOS 2012 -- SOCIAL SCIENCES (5) -- Law (505) -- Comparative law (505017)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">ÖFOS 2012 -- SOCIAL SCIENCES (5) -- Law (505) -- Legal history (505014)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">ÖFOS 2012 -- SOCIAL SCIENCES (5) -- Law (505) -- Roman law (505019)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">BIC Standard Subject Categories -- Law (L) -- Jurisprudence &amp; general issues (LA) -- Systems of law (LAF) -- Common law (LAFC)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">BIC Standard Subject Categories -- Law (L) -- Jurisprudence &amp; general issues (LA) -- Systems of law (LAF) -- Civil codes / Civil law (LAFD)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">BIC Standard Subject Categories -- Law (L) -- Jurisprudence &amp; general issues (LA) -- Systems of law (LAF) -- Roman law (LAFR)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">BIC Standard Subject Categories -- Law (L) -- Jurisprudence &amp; general issues (LA) -- Comparative law (LAM)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">BIC Standard Subject Categories -- Law (L) -- Jurisprudence &amp; general issues (LA) -- Legal history (LAZ)</dc:subject>
  <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0 International</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2023-11</dc:date>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">This book analyses main lines of legal development in the area of proprietary security rights in movable assets (comprising pledges/charges, transfer of ownership for security purposes, assignment of claims for security purposes, and retention of title), starting from Roman law through the era of European codifications up to the present law in particular in Austria, then continues by analysing main questions of this area of law – above all isues concerning registration systems for security rights – in Germany, the Netherlands, France, Belgium and England, and finally analyses, on that basis, whether the “Draft Common Frame of Reference“ (DCFR), presented by an international group of experts in 2009, provides adequate solutions which are suitable to continue these legal developments consequently. The results achieved in this research show that the DCFR offers attractive solutions that are apt for the future development of the law in almost all areas investigated.</dc:description>
</oai_dc:dc>